Thank you for engaging with this, Brent. I don't want to get into a situation where we go back-and-forth on semantics, but my thought on 'legal deserts' are actually what you described--where it's not financially attractive for attorneys to practice. I think reasonable minds can differ, of course. To that end, I think whatever you call it, I 100% agree with you that there is a financial component to this that can't be ignored. Comparing superintendents and county attorneys is an intriguing argument. I think it's a discussion we need to have. Again, thank you, Brent!
------------------------------
Mark Batt
Sarpy County Attorney's Office
Papillion NE
[Phone]
mbatt@sarpy.gov------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 10-15-2025 17:27
From: Brent Michael Kelly
Subject: rural practice/Knox county example
Since the attachment did not work, here is a link to the salary information:
Best,
Original Message:
Sent: 10/15/2025 5:01:00 PM
From: Brent Michael Kelly
Subject: RE: rural practice/Knox county example
Mark,
I am currently practicing in rural Nebraska, and have done so for the last sixteen years.
There are no "legal deserts" in Nebraska in my experience. However, there are many places where it is not financially attractive to practice law. Those places tend not to have lawyers.
My take is this; if Knox County or anywhere else feels they need a County Attorney or any other type of lawyer, they need only look at what their local school superintendent makes in terms of salary and benefits.
It's not terribly surprising that a job that requires more training, education, experience, stress, and longer hours doesn't get filled if the pay is not commensurate with the demands of the job.
To my knowledge, there are no "legal deserts" where the County Attorney, or a private practice attorney could make close or equal to what the local school superintendent makes.
Here's a table for reference.