I represent a small village that is in the middle of a weird jurisdictional issue. A dog bites an individual outside village limits, and a county sheriff deputy took a report. The dog's owners live in the village, so the county attorney believes that it's the village's jurisdiction and won't prosecute. The village doesn't want to prosecute the owners and is trying to resolve things outside the court. The owners have not neutered the dog or microchipped it, pursuant to village code. The village thinks it's not their problem since they believe the owners when they say the dog lives outside the village (though I don't believe that).
The sheriff deputy believes that there may be liability on the village or county if the village code (which I believe is similar to state statute 54-618) isn't followed. Can't the village just claim prosecutorial discretion? Further, could the county force the village to do anything since the dog is being "moved" outside village limits, but still in the county?
Any advice off the listserv would be appreciated.
------------------------------
Daniel McMahon
McM Law Office, L.L.C.
Hastings NE
402-834-2022
dan@mcmlawhastings.com------------------------------